?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

ACTA: Why should Sony own the Internet?

There are nine days left in which to tell the Government what you think about ACTA (the worldwide pact to 'protect copyright' by cutting off internet access if someone thinks you're downloading movies).  Read up on ACTA.  Notice how  your ISP will be made to be the spies of the media companies.  Think how much fun it will be if your Internet access can be cut off with no notice.  

Read this: http://www.publicknowledge.org/alert/ipec

Then tell the OMB what you think about it all.  They wouldn't have to  negotiate ACTA in secret if it were fair in the first place.
 
Ms. Victoria Espinel

Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator
Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
Filed via email

Dear Ms. Espinel:

If access to intellectual property is to be regulated, it should be done wit the interests of the citizens of the United States foremost, not the interests of the media distribution companies.    Enforcement must work in both directions: it is unfair to improperly use another person's work, but it also unfair to deny all access without any legal recourse. 

The Joint Strategic Plan should carefully examine the basis for claims of losses due to infringement; is is far too easy to create numbers with no real factual basis, and use them as a demand for regulation that only serves one side, with no consequences for false claims of infringement.


In a society where digital access to government is being promoted as a means of both empowerment and  cost-cutting, it is dangerous to allow a company's accusation, merely the accusation without proof of damage or opportunity for rebuttal, to cause total disconnection from the digital world.  The damages to citizens would far outweigh the damages to the corporation.  And the corporation making the accusation must be made to pay appropriate damages if and when an accusation is proven false.

Internet service providers should not be required or asked to violate users' privacy in the name of copyright enforcement beyond the scope of the law.  Our right of privacy should not be overridden in the interest of a corporation's auditors.  Efforts to require or recommend that ISPs inspect users' communications should not be part of the Joint Strategic Plan. 

The anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act can criminalize users who are simply trying to make legal uses of the media they have bought. Breaking digital locks on media should not be a crime unless they are being broken for illegal purposes. The government should not spend its resources targeting circumventions for legitimate purposes.

Any plans or agreements on IP enforcement, like the proposed Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) should be made open and transparent. In dealing with questions of copyright and the Internet, too much is at stake for our country's laws and policies to be made out of the public eye.  ACTA and the Joint Strategic Plan would have immediate and stlifing effects of America's ability to communicate, coordinate, educate, and govern.  The debate much be as public as the effect would be.

Sincerely,
 

John F. Reynolds

Concord CA

 (EDIT: two cut links for the same cut.  Must be bargain day).

 

Tags:

Comments

( 1 comment — Leave a comment )
ccdesan
Mar. 16th, 2010 02:53 pm (UTC)
Email sent. Thanks for the heads-up, and I like your customizations.
( 1 comment — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Keri Maijala